Take a quick (and educational) tea break with us! Customers are invited to join a fast and interactive one-on-one Zoom chat with your local Street Furniture Australia representative to learn about street furniture trends, new products and latest projects. Presentations are guaranteed no longer than 10-minutes plus Q&A. Choose from: The Linea range. Wood Without Worry. Or request a custom presentation. Each participant will receive a T2 Ten gift box, which includes 10 teas and tisanes – China Jasmine, French Early Grey, Green Rose, Lemongrass & Ginger, Melbourne Breakfast, Morning Sunshine, New York Breakfast, Packs a Peach, Sleep Tight and Tummy Tea. Book by contacting us on email@example.com, or via the button below. Win $500 worth of pots from Garden Life The first 20 Tea Time bookings for Australian customers …
Reimagining Streets, Not Roads
by Jason Packenham.
Urban leaders are reimagining Australia’s future cities, starting with Streets 2.0 – a cross-disciplinary forum held in Sydney – with the conversation to continue in March at the Cities 4.0 Summit in Melbourne.
With autonomous vehicles on the horizon, now is the time for such events. Provocative discussions at Streets 2.0 raised as many questions as answers.
In continuing this provocation, this piece is as much a recap as it is a wondering of where to from here.
What do we mean by the street? What role do streets play in our cities today? What do we want and need from them?
Looking forward, what is their role in a future with autonomous vehicles? How do we achieve some of the grand visions of Streets 2.0? Are they possible? And if not, what needs to change?
A road and a street – what’s the difference?
Roads and streets are often confused, with negative consequences for the public domain of our cities.
A ‘road’ is a right of way between two points, prioritising thoroughfare (primarily for vehicles) over amenity.
A ‘street’ is a place in its own right. It is for all users and transport modes, and encompasses all that occurs building-to-building; including the building fronts themselves.
The opening discussion of Streets 2.0 saw mention of Austroads, Australia’s national design standards for roads, and there was general consensus on how inappropriate its application is for dense urban environments.
If roads and streets are two different things, don’t our streets — among the most economically, environmentally and socially sustainable places in our cities — deserve their own design standards?
So, where is Austreets?
Such a standard would enable a holistic, building-to-building design approach to ensure our streets are concerned with more than just the free movement of motor vehicles.
Australian city streets desperately need national design standards — binding ones — tailored for urban environments to ensure road designers are working towards a standard of holistic street design, rather than being bound by road design standards.
Such a standard would shift the focus from auto-centric design to a more inclusive framework for pedestrians, cyclists, mass transit and private motor vehicles.
And, as a number of speakers touched on at Streets 2.0, these standards are needed now to pre-empt the arrival of autonomous vehicles in the near future.
How do we design for autonomous vehicles?
Autonomous vehicles will change the way we build and live in our cities, potentially impacting urban form as much as the mass production of the Model T Ford did a century ago.
But as Smart Cities Council ANZ Executive Director Adam Beck observes, urban leaders and thinkers have been largely absent from this forum.
There a few reasons to be wary of the rollout of autonomous vehicles by the motor and technology industries if left unchecked.
One, the potential further sprawling of the urban fringe, or the rise of so-called Carmageddon where autonomous vehicles are sent driverless across the city, doubling the number of car trips our road systems need to cope with.
While autonomous vehicles undoubtedly have their place in the future city, do we know why? What problems are we attempting to solve with autonomous vehicles? And in doing so, what new problems do we create?
As was importantly raised by the Streets 2.0 discussion panel, we need to know what the question is before proposing that autonomous vehicles are the answer.
So, what is our question?
Are we pursuing safer streets? A binding national design standard tailored specifically for urban streets would go a long way to achieving this.
Are we pursuing improved urban mobility? Steven Burgess, self-styled Reformed Traffic Engineer, raised a telling point on the potential of autonomous vehicles as a solution.
He says we would simply reinforce one of the most wasteful, inefficient and environmentally damaging forms of land use and transportation — the private motor vehicle.
Whatever the role for autonomous vehicles in the future city and shared economy, strong, people-first policies and standards are needed to ensure autonomous vehicles take their rightful place in the future street.
But where are all the Steves?
Steven Burgess made perhaps one of the most notable points of the day — traffic engineers will play the pivotal role in introducing autonomous vehicles to the future street. Yet, there was a noticeable absence of traffic engineers at Streets 2.0.
Urban leaders, thinkers and designers will need to better align themselves with traffic engineers if they are to influence the future street.
On that note, perhaps Streets 2.1 can involve the Australian Institute of Traffic Management and Planning?
How do we deliver the Streets 2.0 vision?
The goals drawn from Streets 2.0 are only as good as the design standards, project briefs and budgets that enable them.
To achieve these goals, urban leaders need to be involved in the right discussions, with relevant disciplines (road designers, traffic engineers and economists) in the room working towards a common framework.
Streets need stronger distinction from roads. This needs to be underpinned with binding policies and standards that ensure all levels of the public and private sector adhere to their objectives.
Only then will the future street be green, complete and smart.
Jason Packenham is Senior Landscape Architect with Context.
Cover image from WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff and Farrells White Paper, on autonomous vehicles in the UK.
If you would like to contribute an opinion piece, please contact StreetChat at firstname.lastname@example.org
The Linea range is sleek and minimalist. 100% stainless steel frames support many colours, lengths and mounting types, including plinth and wall-fixed options.
Street Furniture Australia collaborated with Mobility Design Lab from Monash University to reimagine how urban bus stops and shelters could look, feel and work in the near future. The concept proposal was recently shortlisted for the Smarter Hobart Challenge, an international design competition launched by the City of Hobart in 2020. The competition called for “innovative and exciting ideas to help transform Hobart’s public transport services, and help make waiting for the bus reliable, safe, accessible and socially connective.” More than 120 entries were received from teams in Australia, the US, India, South America, Russia, Ukraine, Singapore, Hong Kong, Italy and France. The concept by Monash University and Street Furniture Australia was one of five finalists. Bus travel can sometimes suffer from “a less optimal image” compared with other modes …
StreetChat interviews new AILA National President Linda Corkery. Linda is a highly respected landscape architect with a trifecta portfolio of responsibility: AILA National President, Associate Professor at UNSW and Director of Corkery Consulting. We chat about AILA, the future of cities and how women are faring in her industry. Can you tell us about your journey, from the US to Hong Kong, to Australia? My journey to landscape architecture started at Cornell University in upstate New York. At Cornell, I completed master degrees in urban and regional planning and in landscape architecture. There were a few international students in the program, including an Australian fellow I got to know quite well, Noel Corkery. I finished my studies and headed to Chicago, working first in an urban planning consultancy and then in …
Nicholas Camerer’s prize-winning Hatch Seat is the new centrepiece of a community garden for Karen refugees. Street Furniture Australia manufactured the seat as part of the Intergrain Urban Timber Project competition, which challenged graduate and student landscape architects to design a meaningful piece for the Historic Farm Precinct in Victoria. The resurrected kitchen garden is a place for Karen refugees from Burma to learn new skills and share their culture, the result of a volunteer program by Parks Victoria and Werribee Park in partnership with AMES (Adult Multicultural Education Services). Camerer’s design features red, white and blue panels to represent the colours of both the Karen and Australian flags. Robust timber cross beams double as a leaning rack for gardening tools when not in use as a seat. The landscape architect, from …
Our streets, and our cities, are due for an overhaul, says Adam Beck, but strong collaboration is needed to secure all the working parts. The Executive Director of the Smart Cities Council for Australia and New Zealand will coordinate Streets 2.0, a forum inviting engineers, landscape architects, planners, architects, technologists and policy makers to take part in Sydney on December 6. “Streets 2.0 is a critical discussion the industry has to have,” Beck tells StreetChat. “When streets consume up to 20 to 30 per cent of the land area of our cities and communities, it is worth making them function as sustainably as possible. “Our streets are public spaces. Is the best use of space to fill them with two-tonne metal machines travelling at 60 kilometres an hour?” With ideas …